Intolerance breeds intolerance
Steve Budiansky has a good piece at his Liberal Curmudgeon blog. He argues -- and I agree -- that heavy handed legal attacks on climate scientists, like Attorney general Ken Cucinelli's in Virginia, are reprehensible, but that to some extent environmental scientists are reaping what they have sown, for example in their reaction to Bjorn Lomborg's 2001 book The Skeptical Environmentalist:
Environmental scientists responded with a determination to stamp out this heresy that would have done Torquemada or Khomeini proud. A dozen scientists served Cambridge University Press with a demand that it cease printing the book, fire the editor who oversaw it, and "convene a tribunal" to investigate the book's "errors." Nature ran a truly egregious review by the scientists Stuart Pimm and Jeffrey Harvey attributing to Lomborg ridiculous statements that he never even remotely made in the book or anywhere else. And Pimm and Harvey along with other members of the environmental goon squad lodged a complaint with the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty — a legal body of the state — alleging that Lomborg had committed "scientific misconduct" for having reached conclusions that Pimm and Harvey did not like.

Comments (5)
Great to see Budiansky joining the blogosphere. One of my favourite science writers.
Snip: I feel this comment was too strongly worded and prejudicial. Matt
Interesting that we're also hearing Bjorn Lomborg recently decided climate change is perhaps one of our biggest environmental concerns. I guess he's not saying... he's just saying.
Thank you for introducing me to Stephen. He is irresistible. There is a very well balanced comment re AG v Mann on his website by a guy called “Goldfish”. I would love to steal it and claim it my own but the actual knowledge of US law and also him having had a front-row seat as Congressman Dingell’s Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee in the 1980s would probably be a bit of a giveaway :o)
Thank you for introducing me to Stephen Budiansky. He is irresistible. There is a very well balanced comment re AG v Mann on his website by a guy called “Goldfish”. I would love to steal it and claim it my own but the actual knowledge of US law and also him having had a front-row seat as Congressman Dingell’s Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee in the 1980s would probably be a bit of a giveaway :o)