In my book I point out that an unemployed British father of
three on welfare today receives more in state support than a man on
the average wage received in income in 1957. It's an eye-catching
reminder of how wrong J K Galbraith was to argue that affluence in
the late 1950s had already gone too far.
Now the Institute of Fiscal Studies has compiled data on average incomes in Britain since 1961,
coming to the remarkable conclusion that
in real terms the bottom 25% are now
considerable richer than were the top 25% in 1961.
Here's a graph, (hat tip Tim Worstall)
Of course this underestimates the increase in wealth because it
does not measure the extent to which many goods and services have
got cheaper during this time. Nor does it take any account of
innovations: the products of Vodafone, Starbucks and Google were
unobtainable at any price in 1961.